Iread Pages

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Magazine
  • Ebook
  • Dictionary
  • Novel

Iread Pages

Header Banner

Iread Pages

  • Home
  • Magazine
  • Ebook
  • Dictionary
  • Novel
Dictionary
Home›Dictionary›Merriam-Webster Dictionary: Opinion: Mind your P’S & Q’s, tomahtos-tomaytos

Merriam-Webster Dictionary: Opinion: Mind your P’S & Q’s, tomahtos-tomaytos

By Katrina G. Dibiase
July 2, 2022
0
0
A few Sundays ago, while reading a column that appeared on this page (“The Sycophant in the Room: The World Is Even More Flattering Than It Seems”, bit.ly/3xZX9gn), I learned when I had, all this time, mispronounced the word sycophancy. Instead of “see-co-fantasy”, I had said “sy-co-fantasy” – like psychology. The discovery was mildly amusing in the sense of “Huh, I wonder how nobody noticed this until now?”

In my younger years, something like that would have been disastrous. Pronunciation was a weapon in high school – used to attack the lack of sophistication of any poor soul who pronounced an English word incorrectly. With the benefit of all the years that have passed, and with exposure to many non-English speakers who have achieved distinction in their chosen profession in English-speaking countries, I now understand that poor pronunciation is not really a reflection of anything – other than the inability to remember confusing rules or the reluctance to conform to the demands of the language.

In most cases, it exposes the inconsistent structure of the language. “It’s not me, it’s you” seems like an appropriate English-language response to every pronunciation stumble, a reversal of the classic relationship ending line. Another tangential validation comes from William Strunk Jr, a Cornell University English professor whose fame is his 1920 textbook, The Elements of Style. Strunk is remembered for urging his students, “If you can’t say a word, say it out loud!”

Any missive about inconsistencies in English spelling and pronunciation is incomplete – at least for a fan of Hindi films – without reference to the immortal dialogue from Hrishikesh Mukherjee’s 1975 film Chupke Chupke. In this unforgettable scene, the wealthy old man with multiple diplomas is made unhappy by this question from the young teacher who pretends to be an uneducated driver: “If TO is pronounced ‘too’ and if DO is pronounced ‘doo’ then why is GO not pronounced like ‘ goo’?’ – which is, of course, “poo” in Hindi.

The absurdity of the English language is recognized even by its guardian of its rules – the dictionary. The Pronunciation Guide (online version) section of the Merriam-Webster Dictionary says: “For some languages, such as Spanish, Swahili, and Finnish, the spelling and pronunciation matches so closely that a dictionary need only spell a word correctly to indicate its pronunciation. Modern English, however, does not display such consistency in sound and spelling, and so an English dictionary must devote considerable attention to the pronunciation of the language.

He acknowledges the user’s frustration: ‘[T]his disparity between sound and spelling is just a continual nuisance at school or work. One marvels at the amount of energy the guardians of the English language must expend to shore up all the contradictions of pronunciation with labyrinthine rules that demand the good graces of the brain’s memory center as much as its seat of language. .

The only segment that benefits is the industry that makes money by “teaching” the correct use of English – “spoken English” centers, writing guides, grammar checking services. There’s even a children’s pageant in the United States that’s considered a national institution: the annual Spelling Bee. The first prize is $50,000 and the last 20 of the 25 winners are of Indian origin. Do immigrant parents, carrying with them the burden of memories of their own high school pronunciation misadventures, train their children to be perfect spellers the way others force their children to play music or sports?

Communication experts praise the virtues of clarity, brevity and conviction. How ironic that the most sought-after tool for achieving these ideals is as cumbersome as the English language. Recently, a friend lent me Jared Diamond’s book, Guns, Germs, and Steel, which argues that one of the main causes of Western European domination of the world was its long history of complex societal structures rendered needed by the agrarian economy. Could the ability to maintain a civilization with a language that has cringe-worthy rules also be one of the reasons?

The author is Managing Director, Laboratories, Bangalore

Related posts:

  1. UWC to develop the first Kaaps dictionary
  2. Why use a dictionary in the age of Internet research?
  3. In a nutshell: How to insert your new word in the dictionary
  4. Dictionary.com trolls Mike Richards with the definition of “jeopardy” after his resignation

Categories

  • Dictionary
  • Ebook
  • Magazine
  • Novel

Recent Posts

  • Irritability and new treatments for key symptoms most dissatisfied with autism
  • What is @#$%! Everett’s mom publishes swear dictionary
  • Tony Jeton Selimi’s The Unfakeable Code® Wins Top Shelf Magazine Book Awards 2022 in Four Categories
  • Athol Daily News – Ask the PC Doctor: Can I turn an ebook into an audiobook?
  • eBook: Unlock Complex, Streaming Data with Declarative Data Pipelines

Archives

  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • January 2020
  • February 2019
  • September 2017
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions